| Home | Services | Workshops | In Print | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |

 

The articles provided here are for your information and use in publications. Copyrights cited for each apply.

Each reprint must include the author's name and contact information for the Law Offices of Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq.

 

Return to the list of online articles

 

Online Articles

Common Issues Involving the Division of Developmental Disabilities

by
Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq. and Ira M. Fingles, Esq.

Herbert D. Hinkle Law Office
2651 Main Street
Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648
(609) 896-4200 or (215) 860-2100

Here is a sampling of some common issues involving the Division of Developmental Disabilities ("DDD"). Each is represented by an actual case, modified slightly.

1. Priority for Placement. DDD maintains a waiting list for residential services. The "urgent" list is the only waiting list that actually moves. The child of parents 55 or older qualifies as "urgent." But younger parents can qualify by showing regression, harm or inability to care for the child. Doris, age 40, is a single parent. Roy has cerebral palsy and requires considerable lifting. He also appears less alert than in the past. Doris is under the care of a physician for a back ailment. In view of the foregoing, Roy was added to the urgent waiting list.

2. Retroactive Assignment. Harryâs brother, Michael, lives in a group home in New York. In January 1999, he asked DDD to assign Michael to a waiting list for placement here. Two years later, he learned of the difference between "urgent" and "non-urgent" status and recognized that Michael was on the wrong list. DDD eventually made an adjustment retroactive to 1999.

3. Emergency Placement. Placement on the urgent waiting list means a wait of 5 years or more. Recognition by DDD of an emergency means immediate placement. Daniel, age 20, lives with his grandparents. At times, he can be aggressive. He qualified for immediate emergency placement.

4. Adequacy of Placement. Lori attended a specialized school for children with autism. Upon graduation, DDD proposed placement in a vocational program closer to her home, but which did not emphasize community work experience and behavioral programming. Eventually, DDD recognized that the program it offered was not appropriate and agreed to continue placement at the school.

As this article is being written, DDD is proposing to rewrite its guidelines for placement. A future column will deal with this subject.

 

Copyright 2001 H.D. Hinkle. All rights reserved.

 

Mr. Hinkle maintains a multi-state law practice with offices in Lawrenceville, Florham Park, and Marlton, NJ, and Yardley, Pa. Mr. Hinkle and his colleagues Ira Fingles, and Paul Prior lecture and write frequently on topics of law, aging, and disability, and are available to speak to groups in New Jersey and Pennsylvania at no charge. Call (609) 896-4200.

 

 

| Home | Services | Workshops | In Print | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |